Double standards?

6 07 2006

Last night I was watching the 6:00pm evening news on one of the local free-to-air TV channels. The lead story was about an alleged paedophile living in a small community who’d been ‘outed’ by local residents, at least one of whom’s daughters had been a victim of this person. The reporter, in his ‘holier-than-thou’ way that some reporters have, was wandering the street where this person lived, showing his house, and describing in some detail how this man “…took out his penis…” etc. His tone was very sombre and righteous.

Move on a few minutes… Now the TV News reports an incident in the “Big Brother” house where two male housemates were evicted because of an activity (described as “turkey-slapping” – and yes, it involves a penis… I know this because the News told me so!) they had participated in with one of the female housemates. According to the report, this incident was NOT broadcast on the Big Brother show or its “adults only” late night version – it was only seen on the live internet stream. But this TV channel (not the one that broadcasts Big Brother) saw fit to show a clip of the internet stream – in all its glory – on the 6:00pm news! You couldn’t actually see the penis but there was an implication in the report that it was there.

Move on a few more minutes to the Sport… The reporter talks about the Wimbledon tennis match between Sharapova and someone else, and shows footage. Then they cut to the streaker who invaded the court. His private bits are pixellated out, but there’s no “fuzziness” about the voice-over commentary about “… his penis …”. Cut to the Sports host and the News hosts, all of whom are laughing at this ‘joke’.

So here we have three mentions of male anatomy in the one 20 minute News report. The first is associated with assault on young females, the second is associated with assault by two males on a young-ish female (22), and third is associated with comedy! Weren’t there any young females or children in the audience at Wimbledon for whom this could be construed as assault? Why isn’t it deemed assault (at least an assault on the visual senses) on the two young women who were trying to play tennis? Why is it OK for them to sensationalise the assault in the Big Brother house in a ‘nudge, nudge, wink, wink’ way, yet adopt a very high moral ground when it came to the first report? Why laugh at the streaker who exposed himself (and thus legitimise his act), but get all pompous about the man who exposed himself in another time and place? What gave them the right to broadcast the internet stream when Big Brother themselves chose not to show it? And on the 6:00pm News too. What makes this news?

I’m sorry, but I can’t reconcile how the media can be so fickle and variable in how it treats what could very well amount to the same illegal act just because it occurs in different situations and with different audiences. It smacks of double standards and hypocrisy to me.





Terrific food… shame about the service…

3 07 2006

We joined a group of about 15 ex-colleagues yesterday for the retirement lunch of one of them. Gorgeous winter’s day that felt like spring (I wore a short-sleeved top and didn’t feel the slightest bit cold), great company, terrific food. But the service! In a word, it was ABYSMAL.

And there was no excuse. The restaurant was not full, the orders were not complex (we all chose from the standard menu – no special diets needed to be catered for), most people had only one course, and we were a very reasonable and mature crowd. It started well enough. The waitress deliberately went around the table in sequence taking our orders; I assumed she was doing this so that when she came back with the dishes she knew where they were to go. And no, we didn’t move around as sometimes happens in a large group.

The 4 or 5 entrees (appetizers for the North Americans out there!) came out and were delivered to the right people. So far, so good.

Then the main courses came out. First, they came in dribs and drabs – one person got her meal after some of the others had finished theirs. Next, the waitress delivering the meals would sort of stand and shout “Who had the fish?”; she didn’t have a voice that projected, so she wasn’t heard. Luckily, many on the table were teachers or ex-teachers, so voice projection was not a problem for us. But what happened to the careful sequence in which she’d taken the orders? Next, she came out with two dishes on large square plates with a decent centre indentation – and as she’s trying to ask “Who had the “Fresh from the Field” vegetarian dish?” she tips one of the plates on an angle so that the sauce ran from the centre indentation off the plate and down one of our party’s back and chair! Was there an apology? Perhaps, but it was done so quietly I didn’t hear it. Was there a replacement chair? Nope. Was the woman offered some water and help to sponge off the sauce? Nope. Was she offered free dry-cleaning for her top and perhaps her trousers? Nope. She had to get her own replacement chair as the girl walked off as though nothing had happened.

Later, when the dessert menu came out, two of the party ordered a liqueur and a port to go with the cheese board they were sharing. Cheese board came… no drinks. Coffee came… no drinks. So one of those who’d ordered a port and was nibbling at the cheese because it really DOES taste much better with port, asked the (different) waitress delivering the coffee about the drinks. She said “I’m only doing the coffee” and walked off!

Many of us hadn’t seen each other in years, so there was a lot of chatter. Which means we sat and enjoyed the afternoon. No more water was delivered to the table despite repeated requests; no-one was asked again for repeat coffee orders (and at $3.50 a cup, they could’ve got another $50 off the table with that simple question); no one asked if we wanted more drinks. And then to top off this appalling service, one of the waitresses came by around 3pm and said that the table was reserved for another party! This when there were at least 50 vacant chairs/tables in the room. Whoever that party was, they sure hadn’t arrived. The waitress suggested we go sit in another location. Well, that was it – we all left! So they really did their dough on that one.

And I just remembered a couple of other botch-ups. Three of us decided to share a bottle of local wine listed on the Wine List. We ordered it, and some time later the waitress (possibly a different one again) came out to tell us that the wine shouldn’t be long – they didn’t have any and someone had gone off to the winery to get some! The other was the desserts – all were served without cutlery and we had to ask. And then all we got was a teaspoon, not a fork and spoon as you’d expect.

As I said, the food was great. But the service was shameful, embarrassing, and an absolute disgrace. And this in one of the BIG tourist areas of our city. God forbid what someone from overseas would’ve thought of it.

Oh, and where did this all happen? Chapel Farm on Toodyay Rd in the Swan Valley.